1. IMMUNE SURVEILLANCE – why cancer immunity exists
Who proposed immune surveillance?
- Paul Ehrlich – first suggested tumors arise regularly and the immune system recognizes & destroys them.
- Later expanded by Lewis Thomas + Macfarlane Burnet – immune system constantly patrols body to detect transformed (tumor) cells.
Key supporting evidence
- Tumor-specific T cells + antibodies identified in cancer patients.
- Tumors infiltrated with more cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) show better prognosis.
- Cancer rates increase in immunodeficient hosts (humans + mice).
- Immunotherapy → clinical benefit via re-activating antitumor immunity.
Three big truths of tumor immunity
- Tumors display antigens (abnormal protein flags).
- Tumors evolve immune evasion mechanisms.
- Removing brakes restores T-cell attack (checkpoint therapy).
2. TUMOR ANTIGENS — what the immune system sees
Tumor cells express abnormal/signature proteins: "flags" that immune system can detect.
A. Neoantigens = mutation-derived peptides
- From driver and passenger mutations.
- Mutagens:
- Present novel peptides → immune system recognizes them as foreign.
– UV → skin cancers
– Tobacco carcinogens → lung cancers
B. Unmutated tumor-associated antigens
Normal proteins aberrantly expressed:
- Overexpressed differentiation antigens:
- Cancer-testis antigens (e.g., MAGE, NY-ESO-1):
– Tyrosinase overexpressed in melanomas.
– Normally expressed in testis, which lacks MHC-I → immune system never tolerized.
– When tumor expresses them + MHC I → T cells can respond.
C. Viral tumor antigens
Viruses insert foreign genes → viral proteins expressed in tumor:
- HPV → cervical + oropharyngeal cancers
- EBV → B-cell lymphomas (especially immunosuppressed)
- CD8+ T cells can attack virus-bearing tumor cells
- In HIV/AIDS, weakened immune system → ↑ viral tumor incidence
3. EFFECTIVE ANTI-TUMOR IMMUNITY – how the immune system fights cancer
A. Alarm signals — DAMPs
- Rapid tumor growth → hypoxia, necrosis
- Necrotic death releases Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs)
- Activate dendritic cells + macrophages.
B. Cross-presentation
- DCs eat tumor debris → migrate to draining LN
- Present peptides on MHC-I to naive CD8 T cells
- This pathway = essential for tumor-specific CTL priming.
C. CD8+ T cells (CTLs) — major killers
- Activated in LN → proliferate → circulate to tumor → recognize antigen–MHC I → kill tumor cells.
D. CD4+ Th1 helpers
- Produce IFN-γ → enhances:
– macrophage killing
– MHC expression
– CTL responses
E. Proof CTLs matter
- Tumors escape by losing MHC-I (β2-microglobulin mutations).
- Tumors with more CTL + Th1 infiltration → better prognosis.
F. Other contributing immune cells
- NK cells (target MHC-I–negative cells)
- macrophages (either M1 antitumor or M2 protumor)
- dendritic cells
4. IMMUNE EVASION — how tumors resist immune attack
A. Immunoediting
Immune system eliminates susceptible tumor clones → selects resistant variants → clinically detectable cancer emerges.
B. Escape methods
i) Antigen presentation defects
- Mutate β2-microglobulin → MHC-I cannot assemble → T cells cannot recognize tumor.
ii) T-cell inhibitory pathways
- Tumor expresses PD-L1 → binds PD-1 on T cells → exhaustion.
- CTLA-4 on T cells inhibits activation (competes with CD28 for B7 ligands).
C. Checkpoint blockade therapy
- Antibodies block PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 → remove brakes → restore CTL activity.
- Clinical benefit in:
- Solid tumors response rate ~10–30% (higher in hematologic malignancies).
– melanoma
– NSCLC
– bladder cancer
– Hodgkin lymphoma
D. Toxicities of checkpoint therapies
Because brakes also suppress autoimmunity:
- autoimmune-like inflammation
- colitis
- systemic inflammatory syndromes
→ treated with immunosuppressive drugs.
E. CAR-T cell therapy
- Patient T cells modified with Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)
- Receptor = antibody-derived extracellular domain + intracellular activation signals
- Excellent responses in B-ALL
- Risk: cytokine storm; limited success outside blood cancers; still evolving.
F. Tumor-driven immune reprogramming
Tumors modify surroundings to aid growth:
- recruit Th2 cells
- polarize macrophages → M2
- secrete immunosuppressive mediators
- ↑ angiogenesis + fibrosis
G. Challenges + future direction
- Responses unpredictable.
- Need biomarkers for immune strength + tumor evasion pathway.
- Combination therapies + sequencing strategies being investigated.
- Goal: broad, durable responses with fewer toxicities.
5. GENOMIC INSTABILITY – why tumors accumulate mutations
A. Mutation sources vs cancer rarity
- Mutagens continuously damage DNA.
- Cell DNA repair systems prevent malignant transformation.
B. Defective repair = ↑ cancer risk
Inherited/acquired DNA repair defects → elevated mutation burden.
KEY DNA repair syndromes
1. Mismatch repair — HNPCC (Lynch syndrome)
- Genes repair mismatched bases.
- Two-hit model: inherit 1 mutated allele → acquire 2nd hit.
- Causes:
- MSI appears in:
– colorectal cancers (right colon especially)
– microsatellite instability (hallmark)
– all HNPCC cancers
– ~15% sporadic Colorectal carcinoma
2. Nucleotide excision repair — XP
- Fixes UV-induced pyrimidine crosslinks.
- Absent repair → extremely high skin cancer risk.
3. Homologous recombination repair defects
- Disorders:
- Shared features:
- ATM senses radiation → activates p53 for repair/apoptosis.
– Bloom syndrome
– Ataxia-telangiectasia
– Fanconi anemia
– autosomal recessive
– hypersensitivity to radiation/cross-linking drugs
– neurologic defects (AT), anemia (Fanconi), developmental delay (Bloom)
4. BRCA1 & BRCA2
- Together → ~50% familial breast cancers
- BRCA1 risks:
- BRCA2 risks:
- Both require loss of both alleles for tumor to develop.
- Rare in sporadic breast cancers (unlike TP53 + APC).
– breast
– ovarian epithelial cancer (women)
– prostate (men)
– breast (men + women)
– ovarian
– prostate
– pancreas
– bile duct
– stomach
– melanoma
– B-cell cancers
5. Regulated genomic instability in lymphoid cells
Normal immune diversification intentionally breaks DNA:
- RAG1/2 → V(D)J recombination
- AID → class switching + somatic hypermutation
→ errors can → lymphoid cancers.
🧠 EXAM REFLEX BLOCK — Tumor Immunity & Genomic Instability (ZERO-OMISSION)
Use this as a rapid recall + examiner-trap lock.
🔐 IMMUNE SURVEILLANCE — CORE REFLEX
- Immune surveillance concept proposed by Paul Ehrlich, expanded by Macfarlane Burnet and Lewis Thomas
- Tumors arise frequently → immune system normally eliminates them
- Evidence:
- Tumor-specific CD8⁺ T cells + antibodies detectable
- High CTL infiltration = better prognosis
- Immunodeficiency → ↑ cancer
- Checkpoint inhibitors work → proves immunity exists
👉 Exam line:
Cancer exists despite immune surveillance, not because it is absent.
🏷️ TUMOR ANTIGENS — WHAT T CELLS SEE
1️⃣ Neoantigens (MOST immunogenic)
- Derived from mutations (driver + passenger)
- UV → melanoma; smoking → lung cancer
- Foreign peptides on MHC-I
2️⃣ Tumor-associated self antigens
- Overexpressed differentiation antigens (e.g. tyrosinase in melanoma)
- Cancer-testis antigens (MAGE, NY-ESO-1)
- Normally in testis (no MHC-I)
- When expressed with MHC-I → immune recognition
3️⃣ Viral antigens
- HPV → cervical, oropharyngeal cancer
- EBV → B-cell lymphomas
- Immunosuppression → ↑ viral cancers
👉 Exam trap:
Tumor antigens are not always mutated.
⚔️ EFFECTIVE ANTI-TUMOR IMMUNITY — SEQUENCE
- Tumor necrosis → DAMPs
- Dendritic cell activation
- Cross-presentation
- Tumor antigen on MHC-I
- Primes naïve CD8⁺ T cells in LN
- CD8⁺ CTLs
- Recognize antigen–MHC-I
- Kill via perforin/granzyme
- CD4⁺ Th1
- IFN-γ → ↑ MHC, ↑ macrophage killing, ↑ CTLs
- NK cells
- Kill MHC-I–negative tumors
👉 Proof CTLs matter:
Loss of β2-microglobulin → ↓ MHC-I → immune escape
🧬 IMMUNE EVASION — HOW CANCER ESCAPES
Immunoediting (3 phases)
- Elimination → Equilibrium → Escape
Escape mechanisms
- Antigen loss
- β2-microglobulin mutation → no MHC-I
- Checkpoint activation
- PD-L1 (tumor) → PD-1 (T cell) → exhaustion
- CTLA-4 blocks CD28–B7 costimulation
🧪 CHECKPOINT THERAPY — EXAM MUST-KNOW
- Anti-PD-1 / PD-L1 / CTLA-4 antibodies
- Remove inhibitory brakes → restore CTLs
- Cancers:
- Melanoma
- NSCLC
- Bladder
- Hodgkin lymphoma
- Response rate:
- Solid tumors: 10–30%
- Hematologic: higher
Toxicity
- Autoimmune-type:
- Colitis
- Dermatitis
- Endocrinopathies
- Treat with immunosuppression
🧬 CAR-T THERAPY — REFLEX
- Autologous T cells engineered with CAR(chymeric antigen receptor)
- Antibody-like antigen recognition (MHC-independent)
- Excellent in B-ALL
- Risks:
- Cytokine release syndrome
- Limited success in solid tumors
🧠 TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT — IMMUNE REPROGRAMMING
- ↑ Th2 cells
- Macrophage shift → M2
- Immunosuppressive cytokines
- Angiogenesis + fibrosis
- Net effect → immune paralysis
🧬 GENOMIC INSTABILITY — WHY MUTATIONS ACCUMULATE
- DNA damage is constant
- Cancer is rare → repair systems normally protect
- Repair defects = cancer predisposition
🧠 DNA REPAIR SYNDROMES — HIGH-YIELD TABLE IN WORDS
🔹 Mismatch Repair — HNPCC (Lynch)
- MSI present
- Right-sided colon cancer
- All HNPCC + ~15% sporadic CRC
🔹 Nucleotide Excision Repair — Xeroderma Pigmentosum
- UV damage unrepaired
- Massive skin cancer risk
🔹 Homologous Recombination Defects
- Bloom, Fanconi, Ataxia-telangiectasia
- Radiation sensitivity
- ATM → p53 activation
🔹 BRCA1 / BRCA2
- Require biallelic loss
- BRCA1: breast, ovarian (epithelial), prostate
- BRCA2: breast (♂♀), ovary, prostate, pancreas, bile duct, stomach, melanoma, B-cell cancers
- Rare in sporadic breast cancer
🔹 Physiologic genomic instability (lymphocytes)
- RAG1/2 → V(D)J recombination
- AID → class switch + somatic hypermutation
- Errors → lymphoid malignancy
🧠 FINAL EXAM SUPER-LOCK (ONE-LINE)
Cancer survives by balancing mutation-generated antigenicity with immune evasion, enabled by genomic instability and reversible T-cell suppression.